Village Historian of Dobbs Ferry

NPS Recognition

An appeal to the cause of historical accuracy

DOBBS FERRY WAS A KEY SITE ON THE WASHINGTON-ROCHAMBEAU REVOLUTIONARY ROUTE (W3R) AND SHOULD BE RECOGNIZED AS A KEY SITE ON THE MAIN LEGISLATIVE MAP ACCOMPANYING S. 686 AND H.R. 1286 AND ON NPS EDUCATIONAL MATERIAL

For more than a year public officials in our community, including Mayors Bova and Seskin, the trustees of the Village of Dobbs Ferry, Paul Feiner, Supervisor of the Town of Greenburgh, the trustees of the Dobbs Ferry Historical Society and many private citizens, have been petitioning elected officials in Washington and the National Park Service (NPS) to recognize that Dobbs Ferry was a key site on the Washington-Rochambeau Revolutionary Route and on the proposed Washington-Rochambeau National Historic Trail (S. 686 and H.R. 1286).

Why should Dobbs Ferry be recognized as a key site?

Dobbs Ferry was the starting point of Washington's 1781 march from New York to Virginia and the Battle of Yorktown. The Continental troops assigned to march to Virginia broke camp on Sunday, August 19, 1781, and were "paraded for the march" in the immediate vicinity of Dobbs Ferry's main intersection, present-day Ashford Avenue and Broadway (the Gateway intersection). During July and August, 1781, in the weeks prior to Washington's march to Virginia, Dobbs Ferry was the place of encampment of two elite Continental Army units, Col Alexander Scammel's light infantry and Col. Elisha Sheldon's light dragoons. Soldiers at the Dobbs Ferry redoubt that summer took casualties defending Dobbs Ferry and the encampment from British warships on the Hudson.

In early May, 2007, a few days after Dobbs Ferry gave testimony in Washington, the late Senator Craig Thomas of Wyoming, ranking minority member of the Subcommittee on National Parks, asked Dobbs Ferry to respond to two written questions: The response to Senator Thomas's second question summarizes Dobbs Ferry's historic role at the time of the 1781 summer encampment of the allied American and French Armies:

Questions from Senator Thomas

Linda Borkow, Dobbs Ferry Historical Society, Dobbs Ferry, NY

(1)  Washington-Rochambeau Revolutionary Route (S. 686):  Have you submitted your comments to the National Park Service and are you satisfied with the response they have provided?

Thank you for your questions, Senator Thomas.

The Dobbs Ferry Historical Society submitted a 14-page comment to the National Park Service on December 2, 2006, during the public comment period.

Our comment was provided to the Subcommittee on April 26, 2007 (pages 8 through 21 of the handout).

We have not received a response to the historical evidence and documentation found in our 14-page comment. The only response provided was confirmation that the comment was received by the NPS.

We are not satisfied with their response thus far: we hope that the NPS will respond to the historical content in our 14-page comment.

A stated objective of the NPS Washington-Rochambeau Revolutionary Route Resource Study is “to identify the full range of resources and historic themes associated with this route” (page 2). Because we present abundant evidence that Dobbs Ferry is a key site along the Washington-Rochambeau Route, our comment is relevant to this NPS objective.

The NPS Resource Study also states that the NPS “will carefully review all comments and determine whether any changes should be made to the report” (page 2). This statement suggests that the NPS is prepared to make changes in the Resource Study in response to comments which are relevant and well-substantiated.

 (2)  Are the concerns expressed by the Dobbs Ferry Historical Society the result of an oversight during the NPS study of the Washington – Rochambeau Revolutionary Route or a scholarly difference in the interpretation of the history of the Revolutionary War and the march to Yorktown?  Please explain.

We do not know why Dobbs Ferry was omitted from the NPS map which accompanies this legislation. As was mentioned in our testimony on April 26, 2007, we would welcome any feedback, including any disagreement or challenge that is based on historical evidence. To date, no one has challenged the historical accuracy of our 14-page comment.

For that reason it seems unlikely that the concerns of the Dobbs Ferry Historical Society are the result of a scholarly difference of interpretation of the march to Yorktown or of the history of the Revolutionary War, and it seems more likely to be the result of an oversight.

Similarly, we do not know why the Resource Study associated with this legislation fails to mention:

a. that Dobbs Ferry was the starting point, on Sunday, Aug 19, 1781, of Washington's march from New York to Yorktown, Virginia;

b. that Dobbs Ferry and neighboring localities, such as Ardsley and Edgemont/Greenville, were part of the 1781 summer encampment of the allied American and French armies where the winning strategy for the Revolutionary War was adopted;

 c. that elite military units were deployed in Dobbs Ferry during the 45 days of the encampment (Col Alexander Scammel's First Infantry, described by a respected primary source as “a select corps, consisting of the most active and soldierly young men and officers… intended to march in advance of the main army, constantly prepared for active and hazardous service,”[1]  and Col Elisha Sheldon's Dragoons, the first cavalry of the United States);

d. that a large redoubt, overlooking the Hudson River, was constructed at Dobbs Ferry by American troops.

e. that Dobbs Ferry received cannon fire from British ships on the Hudson River on at least three occasions during the summer encampment of 1781, and fire was returned by the troops in the redoubt, causing considerable damage on one occasion to the HMS Savage, a British ship-of war; the damage to the HMS Savage allowed American prisoners of war on board to escape.

f. and that General Washington placed the name, "Dobbs Ferry" or "Dobbs's Ferry" or "near Dobbs Ferry" at the top of approximately 100 letters which he sent from the encampment, indicating that these were his preferred names for the location of the encampment.

There is one reference to Dobbs Ferry in the text of the Resource Study: On page 17, mention is made of a Hudson River ferry crossing at Dobbs Ferry of 600 officers and men "ahead of the main armies," and this is of definite interest, but no mention is made at all of occurrences a through f, all of which are more important historically than that ferry crossing ahead of the main armies.

Dobbs Ferry appears in very small font on one map in the Resource Study (page 47), along with hundreds of other localities.

It is difficult to draw any conclusions about the historical significance of Dobbs Ferry from the map on page 47.

While we are calling for important changes, compatible with the historical evidence, in the NPS Resource Study and on the NPS map accompanying this legislation, we wish to reiterate our strong support for S. 686 and to express our appreciation to the NPS study team for their hard work in behalf of a wonderful concept, the Washington-Rochambeau National Historic Trail.

 

 

 

Senate Testimony,
Historical Documentation,
Correspondence and
Statements of Support

U. S. Senate testimony
given by Linda Borkow, spokesperson for the Dobbs Ferry Historical Society, before the Subcommittee on National Parks, April 26, 2007
Spoken testimony

Senate testimony information packet, including maps, Washington's correspondence from "Head Quarters Dobbs's Ferry" and the 14-page document of the Dobbs Ferry Historical Society (The Dobbs Ferry Historical Society 14-page document was submitted to the National Park Service on Dec 2, 2006, during the "public comment period.") pdf format: 9,979KB

Statement of support written by Thomas Fleming
Mr. Fleming is a distinguished author, one of the most highly regarded historians in the United States and President of the Society of American Historians. On Jan 6, 2008, Mr. Fleming e-mailed this letter to 15 staff professionals in the offices of Senators and Congressmen involved with the W-R National Historic Trail legislation:

As a former chairman of the American Revolution Round Table and the author of many books on the struggle for independence, I have become interested  in the contest between the town of Dobbs Ferry, NY, and the National Park Service. To put it simply, I cannot understand why the NPS persists in opposing Dobbs Ferry’s request to be included on the official map of the route that General Washington and his French ally, General Rochambeau, followed on their historic march from Westchester County to Yorktown in 1781. 

 

This is a serious matter in our era of growing historical tourism. The proposed Washington-Rochambeau National Historic Trail is likely to become a very popular attraction for hundreds of thousands of people.

 

The Dobbs Ferry Historical Society  submitted a 14 page comment to the NPS on December 2, 2006, with ample evidence that the town was the actual starting point for the march.  My investigation confirms the validity of their maps and citations. This evidence was also submitted to the Senate committee overseeing the matter, the Subcommittee on National Parks.  This bill, S 686, has been reported out of committee. The House bill, HR 1286,  is still under consideration by the Subcommittee on National Parks, Forests and Public Lands.

 

To give you just one piece of this voluminous evidence, General Washington placed the name “Dobbs Ferry” or “near Dobbs Ferry” on no less than 100 letters he sent from his encampment, before the march began. Yet

all the NPS has been willing to do is include Dobbs Ferry in tiny type, along with a dozen other towns in the vicinity.

 

I am a great admirer of the NPS.   They have been very helpful to me while researching many of my books – most notably my recent Washington’s Secret War, The Hidden History of Valley Forge, which received the Fraunces Tavern Award as best book of the year in 2005. But I am also aware that their bureaucratic spokespersons in Washington can be unreasonably stubborn about having their own way.  I think this matter is a case in point. I hope you will take up this dispute with them and resolve it as soon as possible in Dobbs Ferry’s favor.

 

Thomas Fleming